Segregated funds — often called "seg funds" — are investment products sold by insurance companies that, on the surface, look very similar to mutual funds. You invest money, it is pooled with other investors\u2019 money, and a manager invests it according to a stated strategy. The returns you experience are tied to the performance of the underlying investments, just like a mutual fund.

The difference is what sits underneath: a segregated fund is structured as an insurance contract, which brings with it a set of guarantees, protections, and costs that a standard mutual fund does not have.

The core trade-off: segregated funds offer guarantees — principal protection on death and/or maturity, and potential creditor protection — in exchange for higher fees than equivalent mutual funds or ETFs. Whether that trade-off is worthwhile depends entirely on your specific situation.

The Key Features of Segregated Funds

Maturity and Death Benefit Guarantees

Most segregated funds guarantee that, after a specified holding period (commonly 10 years) or upon death, you (or your beneficiaries) will receive at least a specified percentage — typically 75% or 100% — of the amount originally invested, regardless of how the underlying investments performed. If the market value is higher than the guaranteed amount, you receive the higher market value; if lower, the guarantee applies.

Potential Creditor Protection

Because segregated funds are insurance contracts, they may be protected from creditors in the event of bankruptcy or lawsuits — particularly relevant for business owners, professionals in litigation-exposed fields, or anyone concerned about potential creditor claims. The specifics depend on beneficiary designations and provincial legislation, and should be confirmed with a lawyer for your specific situation.

Bypass of Probate

With a named beneficiary, segregated funds pass directly to that beneficiary on death — outside of your estate and outside of probate, similar to life insurance or registered accounts with named beneficiaries. This can mean faster access to funds for beneficiaries and avoids the segregated fund becoming part of the public probate process.

Reset Options

Some segregated funds allow you to "reset" the guarantee level to lock in market gains — if the fund has performed well, you can reset the guaranteed amount to the current (higher) market value, though this may also reset the maturity date clock.

The Cost of These Features

Segregated funds typically carry higher management expense ratios than equivalent mutual funds — often 0.5–1% higher — reflecting the cost of the insurance guarantees. As explored in our article on what MERs cost over time, even a 0.5–1% difference compounds significantly over decades.

FeatureMutual Fund / ETFSegregated Fund
Typical MER0.25–2.5% depending on type1.5–3.5%, generally higher than equivalent mutual fund
Principal guarantee on death/maturityNoYes, typically 75–100%
Potential creditor protectionNo (with limited exceptions)Possible, subject to legislation and beneficiary designation
Bypasses probate with named beneficiaryOnly for registered accounts (RRSP/RRIF/TFSA) with named beneficiaryYes, for both registered and non-registered segregated fund contracts
Reset optionsNot applicableOften available, with conditions

Who Might Benefit From Segregated Funds

Who Might Be Better Served by Mutual Funds or ETFs

A Word on How Segregated Funds Are Sold

Segregated funds are insurance products, sold by licensed insurance advisors (often the same individuals who sell life insurance). Because the guarantees are genuinely valuable for some situations, and because the products carry commissions, it is worth approaching segregated fund recommendations with the same questions you would apply to any product: does this guarantee address a real risk in my situation, and does the cost of that guarantee make sense relative to its likelihood of ever being used?

Segregated funds are not inherently good or bad — they are a tool with a specific trade-off: guarantees and protections, at a higher ongoing cost. For some situations — particularly creditor protection concerns for business owners and professionals — that trade-off is worthwhile. For a long-term diversified investor without those specific concerns, the cost may outweigh the benefit. The right answer depends on your situation, not on a general rule about the product category.

Are You Getting the Most From Your Money?

Free Financial Planning Readiness Checklist designed for engineers, oil patch workers, and high achievers.

Download Free Checklist →